In re Wheel

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Wheel

557 A.2d 92, 151 Vt. 644, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 17

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedFebruary 3, 1989

DocketNo. 86-395

StatusPublished

This text of 557 A.2d 92 (In re Wheel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wheel, 557 A.2d 92, 151 Vt. 644, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 17 (Vt. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board is approved and former Assistant Judge Jane L. Wheel is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canon 3A(3) which requires that “[a] judge should be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom [she] deals in [her] official capacity . . . .” Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rule 11(1) and (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board is approved and former Assistant Judge Jane L. Wheel is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canon 3A(3) which requires that “[a] judge should be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom [she] deals in [her] official capacity . . . .” Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rule 11(1) and (2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

557 A.2d 92, 151 Vt. 644, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wheel-vt-1989.