In re Wheel

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Wheel

557 A.2d 92, 151 Vt. 644, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 17

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided February 3, 1989·No. No. 86-395·Published

Opinion

Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board is approved and former Assistant Judge Jane L. Wheel is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canon 3A(3) which requires that “[a] judge should be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom [she] deals in [her] official capacity . . . .” Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rule 11(1) and (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board is approved and former Assistant Judge Jane L. Wheel is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canon 3A(3) which requires that “[a] judge should be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom [she] deals in [her] official capacity . . . .” Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rule 11(1) and (2).

In re Wheel, 557 A.2d 92, 151 Vt. 644, 1989 Vt. LEXIS 17 (Vt. 1989).

Pincite

557 A.2d 92 (In re Wheel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.