In re Wheel

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Wheel

517 A.2d 609, 147 Vt. 647, 1986 Vt. LEXIS 431

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedOctober 6, 1986

DocketNo. 86-463

StatusPublished

This text of 517 A.2d 609 (In re Wheel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wheel, 517 A.2d 609, 147 Vt. 647, 1986 Vt. LEXIS 431 (Vt. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under 12 V.S.A. App. I, Pt. V, Rule 5(1) the Court makes the following order:

1. Assistant Judge Jane L. Wheel is suspended from acting in any judicial capacity until further order of Court.

2. In order that the provisions of Rule 5(1) providing that such suspension be “without loss of compensation” be fairly implemented, it is directed that Judge Wheel be paid judicial per diem compensation for each of those [648]*648days certified by the Presiding Judge of Chittenden County that the business of that court authorizes the participation of assistant judges. Such certification shall be attached to the voucher submitted by Judge Wheel for pay purposes.

Allen, C.J., concurred with paragraph 1; dissented as to paragraph 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under 12 V.S.A. App. I, Pt. V, Rule 5(1) the Court makes the following order:

1. Assistant Judge Jane L. Wheel is suspended from acting in any judicial capacity until further order of Court.

2. In order that the provisions of Rule 5(1) providing that such suspension be “without loss of compensation” be fairly implemented, it is directed that Judge Wheel be paid judicial per diem compensation for each of those [648]*648days certified by the Presiding Judge of Chittenden County that the business of that court authorizes the participation of assistant judges. Such certification shall be attached to the voucher submitted by Judge Wheel for pay purposes.

Allen, C.J., concurred with paragraph 1; dissented as to paragraph 2.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

517 A.2d 609, 147 Vt. 647, 1986 Vt. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wheel-vt-1986.