In re Wheel

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Wheel

517 A.2d 609, 147 Vt. 647, 1986 Vt. LEXIS 431

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided October 6, 1986·No. No. 86-463·Published

Opinion

In a proceeding under 12 V.S.A. App. I, Pt. V, Rule 5(1) the Court makes the following order:

1. Assistant Judge Jane L. Wheel is suspended from acting in any judicial capacity until further order of Court.

2. In order that the provisions of Rule 5(1) providing that such suspension be “without loss of compensation” be fairly implemented, it is directed that Judge Wheel be paid judicial per diem compensation for each of those [648] days certified by the Presiding Judge of Chittenden County that the business of that court authorizes the participation of assistant judges. Such certification shall be attached to the voucher submitted by Judge Wheel for pay purposes.

Allen, C.J., concurred with paragraph 1; dissented as to paragraph 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under 12 V.S.A. App. I, Pt. V, Rule 5(1) the Court makes the following order:

1. Assistant Judge Jane L. Wheel is suspended from acting in any judicial capacity until further order of Court.

2. In order that the provisions of Rule 5(1) providing that such suspension be “without loss of compensation” be fairly implemented, it is directed that Judge Wheel be paid judicial per diem compensation for each of those [648] days certified by the Presiding Judge of Chittenden County that the business of that court authorizes the participation of assistant judges. Such certification shall be attached to the voucher submitted by Judge Wheel for pay purposes.

Allen, C.J., concurred with paragraph 1; dissented as to paragraph 2.

In re Wheel, 517 A.2d 609, 147 Vt. 647, 1986 Vt. LEXIS 431 (Vt. 1986).

Pincite

517 A.2d 609 (In re Wheel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.