in Re: Whataburger Restaurants LP.
This text of in Re: Whataburger Restaurants LP. (in Re: Whataburger Restaurants LP.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§
§ IN RE: No. 08-10-00250-CV § WHATABURGER RESTAURANTS, LP, AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING § Relator. IN MANDAMUS §
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Relator seeks a writ of mandamus, arguing that the trial court applied the wrong standards
in granting a motion for new trial based on juror misconduct. An order granting a new trial is subject
to mandamus review if the trial court fails to specify the reasons for ordering the new trial. See In re
Columbia Med. Ctr., 290 S.W.3d 204, 215 (Tex. 2009)(orig. proceeding)(“Broad statements such
as ‘in the interest of justice’ are not sufficiently specific.”). But the merits of the grounds stated in
the order are not reviewable by mandamus. See In re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., ___ S.W.3d
___, ___, No. 08-09-00293-CV, 2010 WL 3787623, at *3 (Tex.App.--El Paso, Sept. 29, 2010, orig.
proceeding).
In this case, the trial court complied with Columbia Medical Center by giving specific
reasons for concluding that a new trial was warranted as a result of juror misconduct. Accordingly,
the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
December 8, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ. Chew, C.J., not participating
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Whataburger Restaurants LP., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-whataburger-restaurants-lp-texapp-2010.