In re W.H.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re W.H.

544 S.W.3d 262

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 2017·No. No. ED 104254-01·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

W.H. appeals the trial court's judgment, after a jury trial, committing him to the custody of the Department of Mental Health (DMH) under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

W.H. appeals the trial court's judgment, after a jury trial, committing him to the custody of the Department of Mental Health (DMH) under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

In re W.H., 544 S.W.3d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

544 S.W.3d 262 (In re W.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.