In re W.H.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re W.H.

544 S.W.3d 262

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 19, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104254-01

StatusPublished

This text of 544 S.W.3d 262 (In re W.H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re W.H., 544 S.W.3d 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

W.H. appeals the trial court's judgment, after a jury trial, committing him to the custody of the Department of Mental Health (DMH) under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

W.H. appeals the trial court's judgment, after a jury trial, committing him to the custody of the Department of Mental Health (DMH) under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 S.W.3d 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wh-moctapp-2017.