In re Weyhausen
This text of 29 F. Cas. 848 (In re Weyhausen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[In the matter of William Weyhausen and Philip Ereytag, bankrupts.] In this case, which was a petition in involuntary bankruptcy, the order to show cause was served on only one of two debtors, and no publication of notice as to the other had been made. Both debtors, however, appeared by the same attorney, and desired to waive any other notice. Doubt was raised whether the debtor not served could appear by attorney, and whether he must not appear in person. After hearing counsel, THE COUBT (BLATGHFORD, District Judge) held that, under the forty-first and forty-second sections of the act [of 1867 (14 Stat. 537)], the appearance by attorney, of the debtor not served, might be entered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 F. Cas. 848, 1 Ben. 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-weyhausen-nysd-1867.