In re Westerfield

828 N.E.2d 1287, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 605, 2005 WL 1422296
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 16, 2005
DocketNo. 98S00-0407-DI-308
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 828 N.E.2d 1287 (In re Westerfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Westerfield, 828 N.E.2d 1287, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 605, 2005 WL 1422296 (Ind. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER CONVERTING SUSPENSION FOR NONCOOPERATION WITH THE DISCIPLINARY PROCESS TO INDEFINITE SUSPENSION

On September 13, 2004, pursuant, to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10), this Court suspended the respondent, Divi-na K. Westerfield, from the practice of law in this state for failing to provide to the Disciplinary Commission a response to a grievance filed against her. The Disciplinary Commission has now moved to have the respondent's suspension converted to an indefinite suspension from the practice of law, pursuant to Admis.Disc.R. 23(10)(f)(d). The respondent has not responded to the Commission's motion to convert her current suspension.

We now find that more than six months have passed since the respondent was suspended due to her noncooperation with the disciplinary process. Accordingly, given the passage of time and the respondent's continued failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process, we now find that the respondent's suspension should be converted to an indefinite suspension from the practice of law, pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 23(10)(F)(4).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the current suspension from the practice of law of the respondent, Divina K. Wes-terfield, for failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process is hereby converted to an indefinite suspension, effective immediately. Accordingly, in order to become readmitted to the practice of law in this state, the respondent must successfully petition this Court for readmittance pursuant to Admis.Dise.R. 28(4).

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order to the respondent or her attorney, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entities pursuant to Ad-mis.Disc. R. 28, Section 3(d).

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of: Divina K. Westerfield
64 N.E.3d 218 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
828 N.E.2d 1287, 2005 Ind. LEXIS 605, 2005 WL 1422296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-westerfield-ind-2005.