In re West Coast Rubber Corp.

283 F. 351, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1295
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 1922
DocketNo. 12338
StatusPublished

This text of 283 F. 351 (In re West Coast Rubber Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re West Coast Rubber Corp., 283 F. 351, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1295 (1st Cir. 1922).

Opinion

DOOLING, District Judge.

The language of section 64a of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9648), instead of declaring that the court shall order the trustee to pay first all taxes, etc., declares that it shall order the trustee to pay such taxes in advance of the payment of dividends to creditors. Section 65a (Comp. St. § 9649) declares;

“Dividends of an equal per centum shall be declared and paid on all allowed claims, except such as have priority or are secured.”

The Supreme Court, in the case of Richmond v. Bird, 249 U. S. 174, 39 Sup. Ct. 186, 63 L. Ed. 543, says:

“Section 64a directs that taxes he paid in advance of dividends to creditors ”, and ‘dividends/ as commonly used throughout the act, means partial payment to general creditors.”

Section 64b gives priority to certain labor and attachment claims, and the referee, by the order sought to be reviewed, directed the payment of such claims in advance of the payment of certain taxes due the United States government and the city of San Francisco.

The ordinary rules of construction support the ruling of the referee. The taxes in question are given priority only over “dividends to creditors.” Everywhere else in the act the word “dividend” means a partial payment to general creditors. There is no reason why a different meaning should be assigned to it here.

The order of the referee is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Richmond v. Bird
249 U.S. 174 (Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 F. 351, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-west-coast-rubber-corp-ca1-1922.