in Re Wesley Perkins

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 9, 2018
Docket03-18-00146-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Wesley Perkins (in Re Wesley Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Wesley Perkins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00146-CV

In re Wesley Perkins

ORGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Wesley Perkins has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking relief from

the trial court’s order granting a motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a

that was filed by two of three defendants in the underlying case. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see

also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. To be entitled to mandamus relief, Perkins must show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. See In re Prudential

Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-40 (Tex. 2004) (citing Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833,

840 (Tex.1992)). In this case, Perkins has not shown that he does not have an adequate appellate

remedy from the trial court’s dismissal of his claims against the two defendants pursuant to Rule

91a. See id. at 136-38. Accordingly, having reviewed the petition and the record provided, we

deny the petition for writ of mandamus. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

1 Perkins also sought to have this Court issue orders directing the defendants to take certain actions, as well as a declaration related to the merits of the underlying suit. This Court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against these public officials or to render declaratory judgments. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221 (establishing writ power of courts of appeals); see also City of Ingleside v. Johnson, 537 S.W.2d 145, 149 (Tex. Civ. App.—Corpus Christi 1976, no writ) (holding courts of appeals have no jurisdiction to render declaratory judgment in original proceeding) (citing Lydick v. Chairman of Dallas Cty. Republican Exec. Comm., 456 S.W.2d 740, 741 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1970, no writ); Donald v. Carr, 407 S.W.2d 288, 291 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1966, no writ)). __________________________________________ Jeff L. Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Filed: March 9, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
Donald v. Carr
407 S.W.2d 288 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
City of Ingleside v. Johnson
537 S.W.2d 145 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)
Lydick v. Chairman of the Dallas County Republican Executive Committee
456 S.W.2d 740 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Wesley Perkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wesley-perkins-texapp-2018.