in Re: Wesley Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 8, 2022·No. 05-22-00757-CV·Published

Opinion

Deny and Opinion Filed August 8, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00757-CV

IN RE WESLEY JONES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F22-18807-Y

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Goldstein Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for

emergency relief. Relator seeks relief from the trial court’s denial of his request to

call a witness at relator’s examining trial. Relator’s petition fails to comply with the

rules concerning the requirements for filing a petition for writ of mandamus. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j). Accordingly, we deny relator’s request for mandamus relief.

See In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App—Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding); see also Lizcano v. Chatham, 416 S.W.3d 862, 863 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011)

(Alcala, J., concurring).

220757f.p05 /Bonnie Lee Goldstein/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Wesley Jones, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re: Wesley Jones (in Re: Wesley Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Butler
270 S.W.3d 757 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Lizcano v. Chatham
416 S.W.3d 862 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2011)