In re Weppeler

New York Surrogate's Court

In re Weppeler

2 Dem. Sur. 626

DecidedApril 15, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Dem. Sur. 626 (In re Weppeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Weppeler, 2 Dem. Sur. 626 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

The Surrogate.

The only question submitted for determination is, whether the executor must invest the residuary fund for the life of Mrs. Deubel and, at her death, pay it over to her son Conrad, or whether his duty is, at once, to pay it to her. On the authority of the case of Smith v. Van Ostrand (64 N. Y., 278), it seems clear that she is immediately entitled to the possession of the fund, which she will hold for life, as trustee for her son.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Surrogate.

The only question submitted for determination is, whether the executor must invest the residuary fund for the life of Mrs. Deubel and, at her death, pay it over to her son Conrad, or whether his duty is, at once, to pay it to her. On the authority of the case of Smith v. Van Ostrand (64 N. Y., 278), it seems clear that she is immediately entitled to the possession of the fund, which she will hold for life, as trustee for her son.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Dem. Sur. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-weppeler-nysurct-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack