In re Wenk
678 A.2d 898, 165 Vt. 562, 1996 Vt. LEXIS 50
This text of 678 A.2d 898 (In re Wenk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Wenk, 678 A.2d 898, 165 Vt. 562, 1996 Vt. LEXIS 50 (Vt. 1996).
Opinions
The Board found that respondent’s negligence caused no actual damage and that he paid for his misconduct through the settlement of the malpractice suit. Respondent is remorseful and has cooperated with these disciplinary proceedings. In light of these mitigating factors, the Board’s recommended sanction of a public reprimand is approved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hartford Pizza, Inc. v. Alexandros Galanis
Supreme Court of Vermont, 2015
In re Strouse, Esq.
2011 VT 77 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2011)
In Re Blais
817 A.2d 1266 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
678 A.2d 898, 165 Vt. 562, 1996 Vt. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wenk-vt-1996.