In Re Wenger

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Wenger

6 A.2d 495, 122 N.J.L. 593, 1939 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 161

DecidedJune 3, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.2d 495 (In Re Wenger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Wenger, 6 A.2d 495, 122 N.J.L. 593, 1939 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 161 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The applicant was disbarred January 20th, 1930. He applies for reinstatement or, in the alternative, to be permitted to take the examination for license as an attorney. There have previously been two similar applications, both of which were denied. The matter has been considered by the entire court with the result that the court is unanimously of the opinion that this application also should be denied. That will be the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The applicant was disbarred January 20th, 1930. He applies for reinstatement or, in the alternative, to be permitted to take the examination for license as an attorney. There have previously been two similar applications, both of which were denied. The matter has been considered by the entire court with the result that the court is unanimously of the opinion that this application also should be denied. That will be the order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.2d 495, 122 N.J.L. 593, 1939 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wenger-nj-1939.