In Re: Wendell Wilson

Court of Appeals of Virginia

In Re: Wendell Wilson

602 S.E.2d 408, 44 Va. App. 13, 2004 Va. App. LEXIS 435

CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia

DecidedSeptember 14, 2004

Docket1739042

StatusPublished

This text of 602 S.E.2d 408 (In Re: Wendell Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re: Wendell Wilson, 602 S.E.2d 408, 44 Va. App. 13, 2004 Va. App. LEXIS 435 (Va. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon a Petition for a Writ of Actual Innocence

Wendell Wilson petitions this Court for a Writ of Actual Innocence pursuant to Chapter 19.3 of Title 19.2 of the Code of Virginia. He contends he is innocent of two crimes for *14 which he was convicted in the Circuit Court of the City of Colonial Heights in 1997, to-wit, CR96-112-01 and CR96-11202.

We do not have the authority to issue a writ in this matter. The documentation accompanying Wilson’s petition reveals that he pled guilty to the charges pursuant to a plea agreement. Code § 19.2-327.10 reads in pertinent part: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law or rule of court, upon a petition of a person who was convicted of a felony upon a plea of not guilty, the Court of Appeals shall have the authority to issue writs of actual innocence under this chapter.” (Emphasis added.) Accordingly, we summarily dismiss the petition.

Because the issue addressed herein is one of first impression and potential litigants and members of the bar may benefit from the directives herein, we direct the Clerk to publish this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon a Petition for a Writ of Actual Innocence

Wendell Wilson petitions this Court for a Writ of Actual Innocence pursuant to Chapter 19.3 of Title 19.2 of the Code of Virginia. He contends he is innocent of two crimes for *14 which he was convicted in the Circuit Court of the City of Colonial Heights in 1997, to-wit, CR96-112-01 and CR96-11202.

We do not have the authority to issue a writ in this matter. The documentation accompanying Wilson’s petition reveals that he pled guilty to the charges pursuant to a plea agreement. Code § 19.2-327.10 reads in pertinent part: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law or rule of court, upon a petition of a person who was convicted of a felony upon a plea of not guilty, the Court of Appeals shall have the authority to issue writs of actual innocence under this chapter.” (Emphasis added.) Accordingly, we summarily dismiss the petition.

Because the issue addressed herein is one of first impression and potential litigants and members of the bar may benefit from the directives herein, we direct the Clerk to publish this order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

602 S.E.2d 408, 44 Va. App. 13, 2004 Va. App. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wendell-wilson-vactapp-2004.