In re Weltman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Weltman

206 A.D. 716

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1923·Published

Opinion

Order modified by reducing the amount allowed to $500, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. We think that applications of this character should not be made annually by * committee of the person of the incompetent, especially in cases like the present one, where it appears that the incompetent does not reside with his family or with the committee of the person, but is safely and comfortably cared for in an institution where all his wants are supplied. Such so-called accounts are needless. (See Diaper v. Anderson, 37 Barb. 168; Matter of Hawley, 104 N. Y. 250.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified by reducing the amount allowed to $500, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. We think that applications of this character should not be made annually by * committee of the person of the incompetent, especially in cases like the present one, where it appears that the incompetent does not reside with his family or with the committee of the person, but is safely and comfortably cared for in an institution where all his wants are supplied. Such so-called accounts are needless. (See Diaper v. Anderson, 37 Barb. 168; Matter of Hawley, 104 N. Y. 250.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

In re Weltman, 206 A.D. 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

206 A.D. 716 (In re Weltman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related