in Re Wellshire Financial Services, LLC D/B/A Loanstar Title Loans, D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans, and D/B/A LoanMax Meadowwood Financial Services, LLC D/B/A LoanStar Title Loans, and D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans And Integrity Texas Funding, LP

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Wellshire Financial Services, LLC D/B/A Loanstar Title Loans, D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans, and D/B/A LoanMax Meadowwood Financial Services, LLC D/B/A LoanStar Title Loans, and D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans And Integrity Texas Funding, LP

DecidedFebruary 8, 2017

Docket01-17-00087-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Wellshire Financial Services, LLC D/B/A Loanstar Title Loans, D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans, and D/B/A LoanMax Meadowwood Financial Services, LLC D/B/A LoanStar Title Loans, and D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans And Integrity Texas Funding, LP (in Re Wellshire Financial Services, LLC D/B/A Loanstar Title Loans, D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans, and D/B/A LoanMax Meadowwood Financial Services, LLC D/B/A LoanStar Title Loans, and D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans And Integrity Texas Funding, LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Wellshire Financial Services, LLC D/B/A Loanstar Title Loans, D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans, and D/B/A LoanMax Meadowwood Financial Services, LLC D/B/A LoanStar Title Loans, and D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans And Integrity Texas Funding, LP, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Wellshire Financial Services, LLC d/b/a Loanstar Title Loans d/b/a Moneymax Title Loans and d/b/a Loanmax; Meadowwood Financial Services, LLC d/b/a Loanstar Title Loans and d/b/a Moneymax Title Loans; and Integrity Texas Funding, LP

Appellate case number: 01-17-00087-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-33584

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

The court has received records marked “in camera,” but there is no indication that the records are protected from public disclosure by a Rule 76a sealing order. Appellate opinions are prohibited from being sealed. TEX. R. CIV. P. 76a(1); see TEX. R. APP. P. 47.3. Information contained in the in camera filed documents may be necessary to determine the issues in this mandamus proceeding. Therefore, the parties are hereby notified that we may discuss any and all of the materials marked as in camera in any appellate opinion in this case unless a party demonstrates that a Rule 76a sealing order applies. If either party wishes to continue to assert that documents should not be discussed in any appellate opinion in this case, that party must notify this Court by Friday, February 10, 2017 either that there is a Rule 76a sealing order in place or that the party will pursue a Rule 76a sealing order from the trial court. In reviewing any Rule 76a motion, the trial court should consider an appellate court’s obligation to publish an opinion that “addresses every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal” and to advise the parties of “the basic reasons” for the court’s decision. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.1, 47.4. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown  Acting individually 

Date: February 8, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Wellshire Financial Services, LLC d/b/a Loanstar Title Loans d/b/a Moneymax Title Loans and d/b/a Loanmax; Meadowwood Financial Services, LLC d/b/a Loanstar Title Loans and d/b/a Moneymax Title Loans; and Integrity Texas Funding, LP

Appellate case number: 01-17-00087-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-33584

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

The court has received records marked “in camera,” but there is no indication that the records are protected from public disclosure by a Rule 76a sealing order. Appellate opinions are prohibited from being sealed. TEX. R. CIV. P. 76a(1); see TEX. R. APP. P. 47.3. Information contained in the in camera filed documents may be necessary to determine the issues in this mandamus proceeding. Therefore, the parties are hereby notified that we may discuss any and all of the materials marked as in camera in any appellate opinion in this case unless a party demonstrates that a Rule 76a sealing order applies. If either party wishes to continue to assert that documents should not be discussed in any appellate opinion in this case, that party must notify this Court by Friday, February 10, 2017 either that there is a Rule 76a sealing order in place or that the party will pursue a Rule 76a sealing order from the trial court. In reviewing any Rule 76a motion, the trial court should consider an appellate court’s obligation to publish an opinion that “addresses every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal” and to advise the parties of “the basic reasons” for the court’s decision. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.1, 47.4. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown  Acting individually 

Date: February 8, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re Wellshire Financial Services, LLC D/B/A Loanstar Title Loans, D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans, and D/B/A LoanMax Meadowwood Financial Services, LLC D/B/A LoanStar Title Loans, and D/B/A MoneyMax Title Loans And Integrity Texas Funding, LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wellshire-financial-services-llc-dba-loanstar-title-loans-dba-texapp-2017.