in Re: Wells Fargo
This text of in Re: Wells Fargo (in Re: Wells Fargo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion filed May 15, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00313-CV
IN RE WELLS FARGO BANK TEXAS, N.A.
Original Proceeding
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Wells Fargo Bank.
On May 6, 2003, relator filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus because the parties entered into a Rule 11 agreement in which they agreed to try the underlying action before the trial court. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed May 15, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Edelman, and Draughn.[1]
[1] Justice Joe L. Draughn sitting by assignment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Wells Fargo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wells-fargo-texapp-2003.