In re Wellcome

69 P. 836, 25 Mont. 131, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 67
Montana Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 1901·No. No. 1,401·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam.

Under no practice known to this Court, or to any other court, so far as this Court is advised, can the mere petitions of attorneys and others for the reinstatement of a disbarred attorney be considered.

Said John B. Wellcome not being before this Court in person, or by his petition by him subscribed, asking for reinstatement, and giving’ his reasons therefor, there is nothing which this Court can entertain; and therefore it is ordered:

That said petitions of said attorneys and others be not Considered.

Mr. Justice Pigott is of .the further opinion that the petitions or memorials are frivolous, state no reason why said Wellcome should be admitted to the bar, have no place among the papers or records of this Court, and should, therefore, be stricken from the files.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wellcome, 69 P. 836, 25 Mont. 131, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 67 (Mo. 1901).

69 P. 836 (In re Wellcome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. Wade
167 So. 2d 648 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1964)
Ex Parte Marshall
147 So. 791 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)