In re Wellcome

69 P. 836, 25 Mont. 131, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 67
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 8, 1901
DocketNo. 1,401
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 P. 836 (In re Wellcome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Wellcome, 69 P. 836, 25 Mont. 131, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 67 (Mo. 1901).

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam.

Under no practice known to this Court, or to any other court, so far as this Court is advised, can the mere petitions of attorneys and others for the reinstatement of a disbarred attorney be considered.

Said John B. Wellcome not being before this Court in person, or by his petition by him subscribed, asking for reinstatement, and giving’ his reasons therefor, there is nothing which this Court can entertain; and therefore it is ordered:

That said petitions of said attorneys and others be not Considered.

Mr. Justice Pigott is of .the further opinion that the petitions or memorials are frivolous, state no reason why said Wellcome should be admitted to the bar, have no place among the papers or records of this Court, and should, therefore, be stricken from the files.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mississippi State Bar Ass'n v. Wade
167 So. 2d 648 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1964)
Ex Parte Marshall
147 So. 791 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 P. 836, 25 Mont. 131, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wellcome-mont-1901.