In re Weiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Weiss

261 A.D.2d 708, 687 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4803

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1982. He maintained a law office in New Jersey, where he was admitted in 1971.

By order dated February 3, 1999, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred respondent upon his consent in which he admitted knowing misappropriation of client and/or estate funds. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves to reciprocally discipline respondent, who has not responded to the motion.

In view of the above, we grant petitioner’s motion and reciprocally disbar respondent, effective immediately (see, 22 NYCRR 806.19).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1982. He maintained a law office in New Jersey, where he was admitted in 1971.

By order dated February 3, 1999, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred respondent upon his consent in which he admitted knowing misappropriation of client and/or estate funds. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves to reciprocally discipline respondent, who has not responded to the motion.

In view of the above, we grant petitioner’s motion and reciprocally disbar respondent, effective immediately (see, 22 NYCRR 806.19).

In re Weiss, 261 A.D.2d 708, 687 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

261 A.D.2d 708 (In re Weiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related