In re Weiss

994 A.2d 522, 202 N.J. 36
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 29, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 994 A.2d 522 (In re Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Weiss, 994 A.2d 522, 202 N.J. 36 (N.J. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

JAMES S. WEISS of PITMAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appeai’ing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES S. WEISS is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by JAMES S. WEISS pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
994 A.2d 522, 202 N.J. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-weiss-nj-2010.