In re Weinstock

Second Circuit

In re Weinstock

56 F.2d 829, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 2862

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 7, 1932·No. No. 284·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

This is an appeal without leave from an order upon a petition of a trustee in bankruptcy against the bankrupt, summarily directing him to turn over a sum of money received by him, and alleged to be part of the bankrupt estate. As such it is a bankruptcy proceeding under section 24b, Bankr. Act (11 USCA § 47 (b), and not a controversy in bankruptcy under section 24a of the act (11 USCA § 47 (a). In re Shidlovsky, 224 F. 450 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. v. Moore, 294 F. 852, 855 (C. C. A. 2) (semble); Kirsner v. Taliaferro, 202 F. 51, (C. C. A. 4). There is no jurisdiction without leave to appeal granted within thirty days. In re The Torgovnick, 49 F.(2d) 211 (C. C. A. 2).

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM.

This is an appeal without leave from an order upon a petition of a trustee in bankruptcy against the bankrupt, summarily directing him to turn over a sum of money received by him, and alleged to be part of the bankrupt estate. As such it is a bankruptcy proceeding under section 24b, Bankr. Act (11 USCA § 47 (b), and not a controversy in bankruptcy under section 24a of the act (11 USCA § 47 (a). In re Shidlovsky, 224 F. 450 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. v. Moore, 294 F. 852, 855 (C. C. A. 2) (semble); Kirsner v. Taliaferro, 202 F. 51, (C. C. A. 4). There is no jurisdiction without leave to appeal granted within thirty days. In re The Torgovnick, 49 F.(2d) 211 (C. C. A. 2).

The appeal is dismissed.

In re Weinstock, 56 F.2d 829, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 2862 (2d Cir. 1932).

Pincite

56 F.2d 829 (In re Weinstock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related