In re Weinstat

128 A.D.2d 90, 515 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43527
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) for the First Judicial Department has moved to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b).

This court admitted respondent to practice on November 8, 1982.

[91]*91Respondent was convicted, upon a plea of guilty, in the Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey M. Atlas, J.), entered November 6, 1985, of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.16), which is a class C felony.

A certified copy of the disposition has been presented to this court (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [b]). Upon her conviction, respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]; see, Matter of Dizak, 93 AD2d 680, 681-682 [1st Dept 1983]).

Accordingly, the petition of the DDC should be granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Milonas and Wallach, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective May 19, 1987.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Weinstat, 128 A.D.2d 90, 515 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

128 A.D.2d 90 (In re Weinstat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Katz
64 A.D.3d 163 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)