In Re Weinrauch

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Weinrauch

960 A.2d 626, 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 445, 2008 WL 4998204

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 26, 2008

Docket08-BG-1162

StatusPublished

This text of 960 A.2d 626 (In Re Weinrauch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Weinrauch, 960 A.2d 626, 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 445, 2008 WL 4998204 (D.C. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified opinion of the Maryland Court of Appeals disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Atty. Grievance Comm’n v. Weinrauch, 405 Md. 646, 955 A.2d 269 (2008), this court’s September 17, 2008, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Aaron D. Weinrauch is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Slattery, 767 A.2d 203 (D.C.2001); In re Gil, 656 A.2d 303 (D.C.1995). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified opinion of the Maryland Court of Appeals disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Atty. Grievance Comm’n v. Weinrauch, 405 Md. 646, 955 A.2d 269 (2008), this court’s September 17, 2008, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Aaron D. Weinrauch is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Slattery, 767 A.2d 203 (D.C.2001); In re Gil, 656 A.2d 303 (D.C.1995). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

960 A.2d 626, 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 445, 2008 WL 4998204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-weinrauch-dc-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack