In re Weiner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Weiner

85 A.3d 975, 217 N.J. 146, 2014 WL 982629, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 232

DecidedMarch 13, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 85 A.3d 975 (In re Weiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Weiner, 85 A.3d 975, 217 N.J. 146, 2014 WL 982629, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 232 (N.J. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-073, concluding that BENJAMIN C. WEINER of LIVINGSTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.2(a) (a lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications of a judge), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BENJAMIN C. WEINER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-073, concluding that BENJAMIN C. WEINER of LIVINGSTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.2(a) (a lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications of a judge), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BENJAMIN C. WEINER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 A.3d 975, 217 N.J. 146, 2014 WL 982629, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-weiner-nj-2014.