In re Weinberger

259 A.D. 592, 20 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6211
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 31, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D. 592 (In re Weinberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Weinberger, 259 A.D. 592, 20 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It has been conclusively established by the evidence presented in this proceeding that the respondent had been guilty of using the services of Louis Solomon and Max Solomon, laymen, to solicit and procure retainers in personal injury cases pursuant to agreement to pay them a part of the fees collected by him in such cases. It further appears that payments were made by him to them in accordance with this agreement. Between the years 1925 and 1932 the respondent obtained retainers in more than 800 cases through the efforts of Louis Solomon and Max Solomon.

The respondent should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Rothenberg
18 A.D.2d 397 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 592, 20 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-weinberger-nyappdiv-1940.