In re Weinberger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Weinberger

259 A.D. 592, 20 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6211

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 1940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It has been conclusively established by the evidence presented in this proceeding that the respondent had been guilty of using the services of Louis Solomon and Max Solomon, laymen, to solicit and procure retainers in personal injury cases pursuant to agreement to pay them a part of the fees collected by him in such cases. It further appears that payments were made by him to them in accordance with this agreement. Between the years 1925 and 1932 the respondent obtained retainers in more than 800 cases through the efforts of Louis Solomon and Max Solomon.

The respondent should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It has been conclusively established by the evidence presented in this proceeding that the respondent had been guilty of using the services of Louis Solomon and Max Solomon, laymen, to solicit and procure retainers in personal injury cases pursuant to agreement to pay them a part of the fees collected by him in such cases. It further appears that payments were made by him to them in accordance with this agreement. Between the years 1925 and 1932 the respondent obtained retainers in more than 800 cases through the efforts of Louis Solomon and Max Solomon.

The respondent should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

In re Weinberger, 259 A.D. 592, 20 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 592 (In re Weinberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related