In re Weil

738 A.2d 1290, 162 N.J. 45, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 1513

• Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
• Decided: November 4, 1999
• Status: Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been presented to the Court pursuant to Rule l:20-10(b) following a motion for discipline by consent of BRADLEY J. WEIL of NORTH HALEDON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent acted unethically in two matters, Salcedo and Ferrazzano;

And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct warrants a reprimand;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reviewed the record pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 10(b)(3) and having determined that respondent’s misconduct violated RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest) and RPC 8.4 (conduct involving misrepresentation);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s ethics infractions and having granted the motion for discipline by consent;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of'the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20 — 16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRADLEY J. WEIL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.