In re Weikert

29 F. Cas. 596, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 27
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 F. Cas. 596 (In re Weikert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Weikert, 29 F. Cas. 596, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 27 (N.D.N.Y. 1869).

Opinion

HALL, District Judge,

said that he should adhere to his decision, made early in the administration of the bankrupt law, in the Case of Wells [Case No. 17,387], cited by creditor’s counsel, and that he did not consider it necessary to allege or prove any fraud in the suspension, if it had been continued fourteen days. That the fact that this partnership had been dissolved, could make no difference with the liability of the retired partner, who could have saved the odium of bankruptcy by paying the indebtedness, which was the foundation of this ease, and compelling his late partner to reimburse him, under the agreement of dissolution.

The adjudication was granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marble v. Jamesville Manufacturing Co.
39 N.E. 998 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 F. Cas. 596, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-weikert-nynd-1869.