In re Wedemeyer

253 A.D. 766, 300 N.Y.S. 1201, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5507
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1937·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Resettled decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Richmond county denying the petitioner’s application to revoke letters of administration theretofore issued to the respondent reversed on the law, application granted, and letters of administration revoked, with costs, payable by respondent personally. In the opinion of this court, the surrogate was without power to issue letters of administration where it appeared that the deceased died testate, in the absence of proof that the will was invalid. If there is a present necessity for the appointment of a representative in this State to conserve, during the pendency of the contested probate proceeding in the State of New Jersey, the assets of the estate located here, a temporary administrator may be appointed under section 126 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. The matter is remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for the entry of a decree accordingly. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnson, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Wedemeyer, 253 A.D. 766, 300 N.Y.S. 1201, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

253 A.D. 766 (In re Wedemeyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Von Ripper
95 Misc. 2d 952 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1978)
Dolven v. First National Bank
393 P.2d 196 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1964)
In re the Probate of the Will of Laine
8 A.D.2d 941 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)