In Re Weber

Ohio Court of Appeals

In Re Weber

573 N.E.2d 730, 61 Ohio App. 3d 636, 1989 Ohio App. LEXIS 1273

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 1989

DocketNo. 55937.

StatusPublished

This text of 573 N.E.2d 730 (In Re Weber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Weber, 573 N.E.2d 730, 61 Ohio App. 3d 636, 1989 Ohio App. LEXIS 1273 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Kimberly Weber’s assignment of error is sustained. The authority to impose institutionalization to age twenty-one is permitted under R.C. 2151.355(A)(4) for the delinquent act committed and therefore probation with conditions, such as the revocation of appellant’s driver’s license, to age twenty-one in lieu of institutionalization would be proper. The juvenile court, however, lacked the authority to revoke appellant’s driver’s license for life under any section of R.C. 2151.355.

*637 The judgment of the juvenile court is reversed, and since appellant has attained age twenty-one, the juvenile court judgment is vacated.

Judgment accordingly.

Nahra, P.J., John F. Corrigan and Pryatel, JJ., concur. August Pryatel, J., retired, of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Kimberly Weber’s assignment of error is sustained. The authority to impose institutionalization to age twenty-one is permitted under R.C. 2151.355(A)(4) for the delinquent act committed and therefore probation with conditions, such as the revocation of appellant’s driver’s license, to age twenty-one in lieu of institutionalization would be proper. The juvenile court, however, lacked the authority to revoke appellant’s driver’s license for life under any section of R.C. 2151.355.

*637 The judgment of the juvenile court is reversed, and since appellant has attained age twenty-one, the juvenile court judgment is vacated.

Judgment accordingly.

Nahra, P.J., John F. Corrigan and Pryatel, JJ., concur. August Pryatel, J., retired, of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting by assignment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 N.E.2d 730, 61 Ohio App. 3d 636, 1989 Ohio App. LEXIS 1273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-weber-ohioctapp-1989.