In Re Webber LLC and Its Employee, Melquicedek Garcia Paz v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Webber LLC and Its Employee, Melquicedek Garcia Paz v. the State of Texas (In Re Webber LLC and Its Employee, Melquicedek Garcia Paz v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued April 1, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00463-CV ——————————— IN RE WEBBER COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION, LLC AND MELQUICEDEK GARCIA PAZ, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators Webber Commercial Construction, LLC and Melquicedek Garcia
Paz filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus challenging two orders issued by the trial
court, one denying their motion to compel an independent medical examination of
Real Party in Interest Derrick Pohts, and the other directing them to produce certain documents.1 The challenged orders were signed by the Hon. Jeralynn Manor, then
the presiding judge of the 80th District Court of Harris County, Texas.
On December 5, 2024, after this Petition for Writ of Mandamus was filed,
Judge Manor signed an order transferring the underlying case to the 190th District
Court of Harris County over which the Hon. Beau A. Miller presides. In light of the
transfer, this Court abated this original proceeding and remanded the matter to the
190th District Court to allow Judge Miller to reconsider the trial court rulings
challenged in Relators’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b)
(“If the case is an original proceeding under Rule 52, the court must abate the
proceeding to allow the successor to reconsider the original party’s decision.”).
Relators have now filed an Unopposed Motion to Reinstate and Dismiss
Proceeding, stating that “[t]he parties have settled the civil action that underlies this
proceeding, rendering the mandamus proceeding moot” and asking us to reinstate
and dismiss this original proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); see also In re State
Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 01-22-00619-CV, 2023 WL 4239850, at *1 (Tex.
App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 29, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (granting
relator’s request to dismiss after parties settled their dispute).
1 The underlying case is Derrick Pohts v. Webber Commercial Construction, LLC and Melquicedek Garcia Paz, cause number 2022-30297, pending in the 190th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Hon. Beau A. Miller presiding.
2 We grant Relators’ motion. We reinstate this original proceeding and dismiss
the Petition for Writ of Mandamus. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Johnson, and Dokupil.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Webber LLC and Its Employee, Melquicedek Garcia Paz v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-webber-llc-and-its-employee-melquicedek-garcia-paz-v-the-state-of-texapp-2025.