In re Webb

299 S.E.2d 240, 60 N.C. App. 410, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2459
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 18, 1983
DocketNo. 8114DC1313
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 299 S.E.2d 240 (In re Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Webb, 299 S.E.2d 240, 60 N.C. App. 410, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2459 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

MORRIS, Chief Judge.1

We note at the outset that respondent violated Rule 28(b)(5), Rules of Appellate Procedure, by failing to note the assignments of error and exceptions to which each question is addressed immediately after each question in the argument portion of her brief.

Despite this violation, we have carefully reviewed the record and believe that the findings of fact are clearly supported by the evidence. In custody cases, “it is mandatory . . . that the trial judge be given a wide discretion in making his determination and it is clear that his decision ought not to be upset on appeal absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion.” Greer v. Greer, 5 N.C. App. 160, 163, 167 S.E. 2d 782, 784. We find no showing of an abuse of the judge’s discretion in this case. The judgment is therefore,

Affirmed.

Judges Becton and JOHNSON concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re N.J.
790 S.E.2d 752 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 S.E.2d 240, 60 N.C. App. 410, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-webb-ncctapp-1983.