In re Watson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Watson

200 A.3d 1276, 236 N.J. 493

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJanuary 25, 2019

DocketD-2 September Term 2018; 081786

StatusPublished

This text of 200 A.3d 1276 (In re Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Watson, 200 A.3d 1276, 236 N.J. 493 (N.J. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 18-101, concluding that Raheem S. Watson of Voorhees, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2009, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect); RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Raheem S. Watson is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further *1277ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 18-101, concluding that Raheem S. Watson of Voorhees, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2009, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect); RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Raheem S. Watson is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further *1277ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.3d 1276, 236 N.J. 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-watson-nj-2019.