In re Watson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Watson

759 A.2d 847, 165 N.J. 502, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1223

DecidedOctober 5, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 759 A.2d 847 (In re Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Watson, 759 A.2d 847, 165 N.J. 502, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1223 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that MARK H. WATSON of AUDUBON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.7(a) and (b) (conflict of interest) and the prohibition against participating as broker and attorney expressed in In re Roth, 120 N.J. 665, 577 A.2d 490 (1990), and Opinion 312, 98 N.J.L.J. 646 (1975), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK H. WATSON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI