In re Watson

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Watson

215 Ill. 2d 642

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 2005

DocketMR 20082

StatusPublished

This text of 215 Ill. 2d 642 (In re Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Watson, 215 Ill. 2d 642 (Ill. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed. Respondent G. Andrew Watson is suspended from the practice of law for 90 days and required to complete the program offered by the Illinois Professional Responsibility Institute within six months of the entry of this order.

Suspension effective June 10, 2005.

Respondent G. Andrew Watson shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed. Respondent G. Andrew Watson is suspended from the practice of law for 90 days and required to complete the program offered by the Illinois Professional Responsibility Institute within six months of the entry of this order.

Suspension effective June 10, 2005.

Respondent G. Andrew Watson shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 Ill. 2d 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-watson-ill-2005.