In re Waterman
113 A.D. 921
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Waterman. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 A.D. 115 →
Opinion
Order cf the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county reversed on argument, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for stay denied. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Gaynor, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Waterman, 113 A.D. 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
113 A.D. 921 (In re Waterman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.