In re Wasserstrom

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Wasserstrom

762 A.2d 1083

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 17, 2000

DocketNo. 612 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 762 A.2d 1083 (In re Wasserstrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Wasserstrom, 762 A.2d 1083 (Pa. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2000, a Rule having been entered by this Court on September 14, 2000, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E.; directing David E. Wasserstrom to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; David E. Wasserstrom is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2000, a Rule having been entered by this Court on September 14, 2000, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E.; directing David E. Wasserstrom to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; David E. Wasserstrom is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

762 A.2d 1083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wasserstrom-pa-2000.