In re Washington

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Washington

214 Ill. 2d 569

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 2005

DocketMR 19844

StatusPublished

This text of 214 Ill. 2d 569 (In re Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Washington, 214 Ill. 2d 569 (Ill. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by respondent Earl Louis Washington for leave to file exceptions to the report and recommendation of the Review Board is denied. As recommended by the Review Board, in part, respondent is suspended from the practice of law for nine months and until he makes restitution to Rose Booker in the amount of $2,500. Suspension effective April 8, 2005.

Respondent Earl Louis Washington shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by respondent Earl Louis Washington for leave to file exceptions to the report and recommendation of the Review Board is denied. As recommended by the Review Board, in part, respondent is suspended from the practice of law for nine months and until he makes restitution to Rose Booker in the amount of $2,500. Suspension effective April 8, 2005.

Respondent Earl Louis Washington shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 Ill. 2d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-washington-ill-2005.