In re Warrior Run Borough Election

54 Pa. D. & C. 183, 1945 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 74
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County
DecidedJuly 12, 1945
Docketno. 502
StatusPublished

This text of 54 Pa. D. & C. 183 (In re Warrior Run Borough Election) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Warrior Run Borough Election, 54 Pa. D. & C. 183, 1945 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 74 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1945).

Opinion

Aponick, J.,

This is an appeal from the action of the county election board in certifying the result of the primary election in the Borough of Warrior Run. The sole question arises out of the validity of the soldier ballot cast by one Edward Sovina. Petitioners offered to prove that Sovina was not a member of the armed forces at the time he cast his ballot, having been discharged two days previously. The election board produced the envelope in which the ballot was mailed, on the back of which appeared a due and proper affidavit as required by law.

We think this application overlooks the functions of the court on such an appeal. We are limited to a consideration of the same questions as were before the election board and our jurisdiction is no broader than that of the board: Twenty-eighth Congressional Dis-; trict Nomination, 268 Pa. 313; Eighteenth Congressional District Nomination, 275 Pa. 449. The board is limited to a consideration of fraud and error in making [184]*184the computation. It cannot consider the validity of the individual votes. Consequently, we have no power to do so.

Petitioners, in effect, ask us to determine whether Edward Sovina was entitled to use a soldier’s ballot and, if not, to strike his vote from the computation. In order to do so we must determine his qualifications and also how he voted. These are questions for a contest and cannot be raised on an appeal from the computation of the votes cast: Eighteenth Congressional District Nomination, supra.

Appeal dismissed at the cost of petitioners.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Twenty-Eighth Congressional District Nomination
112 A. 74 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Focht's Appeal
119 A. 494 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Pa. D. & C. 183, 1945 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-warrior-run-borough-election-pactcomplluzern-1945.