In re Warren

Supreme Court

In re Warren

178 L. Ed. 2d 517, 131 S. Ct. 660, 562 U.S. 1059, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9258, 79 U.S.L.W. 3329

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 29, 2010·No. No. 10-6704·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

In re Warren, 178 L. Ed. 2d 517, 131 S. Ct. 660, 562 U.S. 1059, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9258, 79 U.S.L.W. 3329 (U.S. 2010).

Pincite

178 L. Ed. 2d 517 (In re Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related