In re Warren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Warren

30 A.D.2d 164, 291 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3708

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 164 (In re Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Warren, 30 A.D.2d 164, 291 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to the Bar in the First Department in 1937, converted two unrelated escrow funds of former clients. On December 6, 1951, respondent was advised in writing by the Committee on Grievances that it disapproved of his personal use of escrow funds and the issuance of worthless checks. On March 2, 1966, respondent was admonished by petitioner’s Committee on Grievances for engaging in a course of conduct of issuing 147 worthless checks. Despite the warning and admonition respondent subsequent to March, 1966 issued many worthless checks.

[165]*165The Referee’s report of respondent’s guilt on each of the charges of professional misconduct is amply established by the evidence and is confirmed. The respondent should be disbarred. (See Matter of Berkson, 282 App..Div. 265.)

Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred effective July 18,1968.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to the Bar in the First Department in 1937, converted two unrelated escrow funds of former clients. On December 6, 1951, respondent was advised in writing by the Committee on Grievances that it disapproved of his personal use of escrow funds and the issuance of worthless checks. On March 2, 1966, respondent was admonished by petitioner’s Committee on Grievances for engaging in a course of conduct of issuing 147 worthless checks. Despite the warning and admonition respondent subsequent to March, 1966 issued many worthless checks.

[165]*165The Referee’s report of respondent’s guilt on each of the charges of professional misconduct is amply established by the evidence and is confirmed. The respondent should be disbarred. (See Matter of Berkson, 282 App..Div. 265.)

Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred effective July 18,1968.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 164, 291 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-warren-nyappdiv-1968.