In re Warner

3 Wend. 424
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ed^gainst^s absconding or concealed debtors satisfactorily shew that they had not absconded concealed ““a supersedeas ediwith cos£ although the creditor had Where per-reason to Relieve that the debtors had absconded or were concealed.

Motion for a supersedeas to an attachment issued in this case* From the evidence given by the debtors, it satisfactorily appeared that they had not absconded, and were not con- , i . . , , sealed at the time that the petition was presented for an attachment; although, from the facts and circumstances, the . ’ creditor and his witnesses were authorized to say that they Relieved that the debtors had absconded or were concealed, The motion for a supersedeas was granted, with costs ; the costs °f last term to t*6 set 0-T against the costs of this motion,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Warner, 3 Wend. 424 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

3 Wend. 424 (In re Warner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelley v. Force
18 A. 1037 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1889)