In Re Warner

203 A.2d 259, 43 N.J. 254, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 149
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 22, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 A.2d 259 (In Re Warner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Warner, 203 A.2d 259, 43 N.J. 254, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 149 (N.J. 1964).

Opinion

Pek CuRIAM.

The respondent was convicted of grand theft, a felony, in the Superior Court of California. On appeal the conviction was affirmed. People v. Warner, 134 Cal. App. 2d 829, 286 P. 2d 560 (D. Ct. App. 1955). The Supreme Court of the United States denied his application for a writ of certiorari. Warner v. California, 351 U. S. 912, 76 S. Ct. 701, 100 L. Ed. 1446 (1956). The respondent has offered his resignation from the bar of this State but in the circumstances that offer is unacceptable.

The order of the court is that the name of the respondent be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

For disbarment — Chief Justice WeiNTRAub, and Justices Jaoobs, FraNois, Proctor, Hail, SohettiNo and HaNemaN —7. Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Goldberg
520 A.2d 1147 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.2d 259, 43 N.J. 254, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-warner-nj-1964.