In re Warner

D. Connecticut

In re Warner

144 F. 987, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 284

CourtDistrict Court, D. Connecticut

DecidedApril 17, 1906

DocketNo. 1,495

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 144 F. 987 (In re Warner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Warner, 144 F. 987, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 284 (D. Conn. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

In this matter the equities attaching to all creditors are equal, except in this, that the attaching creditoi may [989]*989be entitled to a little greater consideration for his diligence in following his debt. If nothing prevented, the ride that, when the exact hour at which two events occurred can be known, the court will use such knowledge in the interest of justice, would appeal to the conscience of the court. It happens, however, that section 31 of the act under which we are proceeding (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 554 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3434]) stands in the way, and states explicitly the rule which must be followed, and when we apply that rule to the case in hand, and exclude the day of adjudication as we reckon backwards toward the date of attachment, we find that the attachment came within the four months and was dissolved by the adjudication.

The decision of the referee is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLATT, District Judge.

In this matter the equities attaching to all creditors are equal, except in this, that the attaching creditoi may [989]*989be entitled to a little greater consideration for his diligence in following his debt. If nothing prevented, the ride that, when the exact hour at which two events occurred can be known, the court will use such knowledge in the interest of justice, would appeal to the conscience of the court. It happens, however, that section 31 of the act under which we are proceeding (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 554 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3434]) stands in the way, and states explicitly the rule which must be followed, and when we apply that rule to the case in hand, and exclude the day of adjudication as we reckon backwards toward the date of attachment, we find that the attachment came within the four months and was dissolved by the adjudication.

The decision of the referee is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 F. 987, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-warner-ctd-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack