In re Warlick

513 S.E.2d 352, 334 S.C. 242, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 32
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 513 S.E.2d 352 (In re Warlick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Warlick, 513 S.E.2d 352, 334 S.C. 242, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 32 (S.C. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER

By separate order, respondent was placed on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that Perry H. Gravely, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Gravely shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, ■ SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Gravely may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating accounts), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts) of respondent shall serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Perry H. Gravely, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Warlick
573 S.E.2d 776 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
513 S.E.2d 352, 334 S.C. 242, 1999 S.C. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-warlick-sc-1999.