In re Warfman
90 A.D.2d 740, 456 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18932
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Warfman. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 A.D.2d 356 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1982·Published
Opinion
Respondent suspended as an attorney and counselor at law immediately pending a motion for disbarment, as indicated in the order of this court. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Ross and Milonas, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Warfman, 90 A.D.2d 740, 456 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18932 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).
90 A.D.2d 740 (In re Warfman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.