In re Ware
This text of 158 P.3d 329 (In re Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On June 3, 2005, this court suspended the respondent, Rebecca Arlene Ware, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 1 year. See In re Ware, 279 Kan. 884, 112 P.3d 155 (2005). Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs of the disciplinary action and comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2006 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 314).
The Disciplinary Administrator’s office has verified that the respondent has fully complied with the conditions imposed upon her. This court finds that the respondent, Rebecca Arlene Ware, should be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Kansas.
It Is Therefore Ordered that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Kansas as of the date of this order.
It Is Further Ordered that this order of reinstatement shall be published in the official Kansas Reports.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 P.3d 329, 283 Kan. 268, 2007 Kan. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ware-kan-2007.