In re Warbasse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Warbasse

228 A.D. 826

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1930·Published

Opinion

Report of official referee that respondent be suspended from the practice of the law for one year considered, and respondent suspended for a period of two years. Young, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Rich, J., votes to confirm report of official referee; Lazansky, P. J., votes to disbar with the following memorandum: Certain facts in this case similar to those found in Matter of Marlow (225 App. Div. 252) and Matter of Gondelman (Id. 462) and which were largely inducive of the determinations in those cases, and respondent’s avoidance for a long period of time of the investigation conducted by Mr. Justice Faber, compel this conclusion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Report of official referee that respondent be suspended from the practice of the law for one year considered, and respondent suspended for a period of two years. Young, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Rich, J., votes to confirm report of official referee; Lazansky, P. J., votes to disbar with the following memorandum: Certain facts in this case similar to those found in Matter of Marlow (225 App. Div. 252) and Matter of Gondelman (Id. 462) and which were largely inducive of the determinations in those cases, and respondent’s avoidance for a long period of time of the investigation conducted by Mr. Justice Faber, compel this conclusion.

In re Warbasse, 228 A.D. 826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

228 A.D. 826 (In re Warbasse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related