in Re: Wanda June Crenshaw McDaniel

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 28, 2008
Docket13-08-00224-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Wanda June Crenshaw McDaniel (in Re: Wanda June Crenshaw McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Wanda June Crenshaw McDaniel, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-08-00224-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________



IN RE WANDA JUNE CRENSHAW MCDANIEL



On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
____________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (1)



Relator, Wanda June Crenshaw McDaniel, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on April 21, 2008. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 28th day of April, 2008.

1.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Wanda June Crenshaw McDaniel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wanda-june-crenshaw-mcdaniel-texapp-2008.