In re Walton

Idaho Supreme Court

In re Walton

104 P. 659, 17 Idaho 171, 1909 Ida. LEXIS 82

DecidedNovember 2, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 104 P. 659 (In re Walton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Walton, 104 P. 659, 17 Idaho 171, 1909 Ida. LEXIS 82 (Idaho 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

STEWART, J.

— The petitioner in this case was charged with the crime of selling intoxicating liquors without a license and was tried before a justice of the peace in and for Ada county. He was convicted in the justice’s court and fined in the sum of two hundred dollars, with costs taxed at $69.44, and ordered imprisoned in the county jail till such fine and [172]*172costs be paid, the time of imprisonment not to exceed one day for each two dollars of such fine and costs. From this judgment he appealed to the district court and gave the undertaking provided for in see. '8324 of the Rev. Codes. Upon trial in the district court he was convicted, and the court entered the following judgment against him:

“It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said E. F. Walton is guilty of selling intoxicating liquors without a license, and that he be punished by imprisonment in the county jail of the county of Ada, state of Idaho, for the term of fifty days or pay a fine of one hundred dollars, or two dollars for each day of said term not served.

“The defendant was then remanded to the custody of the sheriff of the county of Ada, state of Idaho.”

The decision rendered by this court upon the petition of Ira Alzamon Lucas, for a writ of habeas corpus, is decisive of this ease, and for the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment rendered by the district court in this case was in excess of the jurisdiction of such court, and the defendant must be discharged.

The punishment prescribed by Rev. Codes, see. 1518, for selling or giving away intoxicating liquors without first procuring a license, is a fine in any sum not less than $100 nor more than $300. Under this statute imprisonment cannot be made a part of the punishment by the district court, upon appeal from a conviction in a justice’s or probate court, where a supersedeas bond is given as provided for in Rev. Codes, sec. 8324, and the district court is without power or jurisdiction to imprison the defendant. The petitioner is discharged.

Sullivan, C. J., and Ailshie, J\, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STEWART, J.

— The petitioner in this case was charged with the crime of selling intoxicating liquors without a license and was tried before a justice of the peace in and for Ada county. He was convicted in the justice’s court and fined in the sum of two hundred dollars, with costs taxed at $69.44, and ordered imprisoned in the county jail till such fine and [172]*172costs be paid, the time of imprisonment not to exceed one day for each two dollars of such fine and costs. From this judgment he appealed to the district court and gave the undertaking provided for in see. '8324 of the Rev. Codes. Upon trial in the district court he was convicted, and the court entered the following judgment against him:

“It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the said E. F. Walton is guilty of selling intoxicating liquors without a license, and that he be punished by imprisonment in the county jail of the county of Ada, state of Idaho, for the term of fifty days or pay a fine of one hundred dollars, or two dollars for each day of said term not served.

“The defendant was then remanded to the custody of the sheriff of the county of Ada, state of Idaho.”

The decision rendered by this court upon the petition of Ira Alzamon Lucas, for a writ of habeas corpus, is decisive of this ease, and for the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment rendered by the district court in this case was in excess of the jurisdiction of such court, and the defendant must be discharged.

The punishment prescribed by Rev. Codes, see. 1518, for selling or giving away intoxicating liquors without first procuring a license, is a fine in any sum not less than $100 nor more than $300. Under this statute imprisonment cannot be made a part of the punishment by the district court, upon appeal from a conviction in a justice’s or probate court, where a supersedeas bond is given as provided for in Rev. Codes, sec. 8324, and the district court is without power or jurisdiction to imprison the defendant. The petitioner is discharged.

Sullivan, C. J., and Ailshie, J\, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 P. 659, 17 Idaho 171, 1909 Ida. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-walton-idaho-1909.