In re Walters

847 N.E.2d 1225, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1479
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 24, 2006
Docket2006-0613
StatusPublished

This text of 847 N.E.2d 1225 (In re Walters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Walters, 847 N.E.2d 1225, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1479 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

Fairfield App. Nos. 2005-CA-65 and 2005-CA-66, 2006-Ohio-631. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III and cause consolidated with 2006-0614, In re Walters, Fairfield App. Nos. 2005-CA-65 and 2005-CA-66, 2006-Ohio-631.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would accept the appeal on all Propositions of Law. O’Donnell, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II only. Resnick and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Walters, Unpublished Decision (2-8-2006)
2006 Ohio 631 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 N.E.2d 1225, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-walters-ohio-2006.