In re Walter K.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Walter K.

15 A.D.3d 404, 788 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1379

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 A.D.3d 404 (In re Walter K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Walter K., 15 A.D.3d 404, 788 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Porzio, J.), dated August 27, 2003, which extended an order of the same court dated September 5, 2002, releasing the child to her under the supervision of the Administration for Children’s Services, for a period of 12 months, and (2) an order of the same court dated October 17, 2003, which, inter alia, placed the child in the custody of the Administration for Children’s Services for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The orders appealed from expired by their own terms. Accordingly the appeals are dismissed as academic (see Matter of Starcy G., 13 AD3d 532 [ 2004]). Adams, J.P, Cozier, Santucci and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Porzio, J.), dated August 27, 2003, which extended an order of the same court dated September 5, 2002, releasing the child to her under the supervision of the Administration for Children’s Services, for a period of 12 months, and (2) an order of the same court dated October 17, 2003, which, inter alia, placed the child in the custody of the Administration for Children’s Services for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The orders appealed from expired by their own terms. Accordingly the appeals are dismissed as academic (see Matter of Starcy G., 13 AD3d 532 [ 2004]). Adams, J.P, Cozier, Santucci and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.3d 404, 788 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-walter-k-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack